![]() It was a very odd expression of juror discontent. “It was a big question: ‘What is the message they’re trying to send?’ I’d never seen anything like it. “I do remember that day when they all came in in black clothing,” says Newton, though he shares that he and his peers were not privy to behind-the-scenes jury machinations. ![]() Plus, a special addendum to last week’s discussion regarding the glove demonstration. In other words, these weekly digests are best considered supplements to American Crime Story, rather than counterarguments.īelow are Newton’s insights into the veracity and potency of events and characterizations presented in “A Jury in Jail” (read his take on episode seven, “Conspiracy Theories,” here ). The intention here is less to debunk an explicitly dramatized version of true events than to help viewers piece together a holistic picture of the circumstances surrounding Nicole’s and Goldman’s murders and O.J.’s eventual acquittal. handles with care versus when it deviates from documented fact and common perception. We’re walking through all ten episodes with author, magazine editor, and UCLA communication-studies professor Jim Newton - who was the Los Angeles Times’ lead reporter for the duration of Simpson’s arrest and trial - in an effort to identify what People v. Simpson’s guilt or innocence in the murders of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ronald Goldman. Simpson: American Crime Story, takes us through the 1994–1995 criminal trial assessing football star turned Hollywood icon O.J. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |